Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rick Gibson's avatar

It used to be that governments would build public housing, in effect bare bones apartment buildings or townhouses, with subsidized rents, for those who couldn’t otherwise afford to rent or buy. It has come to light recently in Nova Scotia that many of these units are vacant, because it takes forever to do the repairs when long term tenants move out. Other units were built for families and are now occupied by single senior citizens, because nobody wants to evict them from their home, so the capacity is greater than the occupancy. Other units have been occupied for years by people who needed a leg up way back in the day, but now have a good income and are simply happy to enjoy the low rent. The bottom line seems to be that the public housing stock has been mismanaged. Lots of people on the waiting list while there are lots of empty units and under occupied units. Nothing new gets built, even though the demand is there.

More recently, the buzzword is “affordable housing”. The idea seems to be that government will bribe landlords to provide a certain number of units at a reduced rent. Considering how long this latter strategy has been operational, I would love to see a report telling me how many units have been created and what effect it has had in meeting the need. My sense is that landlords pay lip service to the concept, other tenants aren’t happy that some folks are getting subsidized rents, and nobody is overseeing the entire mess. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that the affordable units never actually “happen”.

If some level of government wants to make something happen in a hurry, they should build a bunch of public housing and then manage it properly. It’s visible, manageable, affordable, and can be quite standard in terms of design, etc., so there are probably economies of scale.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts